Maine Files🔍 Search

People › State House

Susan Longchamps R

On the November ballot: State House District 93 (Lewiston)

Findings

Prompts to look closer at the public records, each with the rule and the law it rests on. None is a finding of wrongdoing. All findings

Context Outside spending

Outside groups spent $1,144 for or against them, more than their campaign's $0

Independent expenditures: $53 supporting and $1,091 opposing. The largest: MAINE DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE $1,091 (against); People Over Politics PAC $53 (for).

What to check
  • Who funds the largest spenders (their own reports to the Commission)
Rule: Outside spending larger than the campaign
“"independent expenditure" means any expenditure made by a person, party committee or political action committee that is not made in cooperation, consultation or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate”21-A MRSA §1019-B(1) ✓ quoted from the saved copy · how this rule works

Financial disclosure, 2025

From the personal financial disclosure they filed with the Maine Ethics Commission on September 24, 2026. Maine's form lists sources and positions, not amounts: the law asks for each source of $2,000 or more in the year, and each state agency sold $10,000 or more (1 MRSA §1016-G). Family members aren't named.

Self-employment

Family members

Outside spending for and against them

$53spent supporting them
$1,091spent opposing them
SpenderAmount
MAINE DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE
1 expenditure · the race
against$1,091
People Over Politics PAC
1 expenditure · the race
for$53

Independent expenditures reported to the Ethics Commission in 2026. The candidate doesn't control them.

Nothing on file yet beyond the ballot.